¼ö¿ëÀÚ¿Í °úÇÐÁ¤º¸: °úÇÐÁö½Ä¸ðÇü
(1) Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. Chapter 7
(2) Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13(3), 273-294
¼ö¿ëÀÚÀÇ °úÇÐÀÎ½Ä ÀÌÇØ
(1) Scheufele, D. A. (2006). Messages and heuristics: How audiences form attitudes about emerging technologies. In J. Turney (Ed.), Engaging science: Thoughts, deeds, analysis and action (pp. 20-25). London: The Wellcome Trust
(2) Scheufele, D. A. (2007). Opinion climates, spirals of silence, and biotechnology: Public opinion as a heuristic for scientific decision making. In D. Brossard, J. Shanahan, and T. C. Nesbitt (Eds.), The public, the media, and agricultural biotechnology: An international casebook (pp.231-244). Cambridge, MA: CABI/Oxford University Press
(3) Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Dominique
Brossard, and Bruce V. Lewenstein. 2002. Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A
media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication
Research 29.5: 584–608
(4) Ho, S. S., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2008). Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research.
International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(2), 171-192.
¹Ìµð¾î¿Í °úÇÐ
(1) Boykoff, M., & Boykoff, J. (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: A case‐study of US mass media coverage. Geoforum, 38, 1190‐1204.
(2) Peters, H. P., Brossard, D., de Cheveigné, S., Dunwoody, S., Kallfass, M., Miller, S., et al. (2008). Science communication: Interactions with the mass media. Science, 321(5886), 204-205.
(3) McComas, Katherine A., and Leah M. Simone. 2003. Media coverage of conflicts of
interest in science. Science Communication 24.4: 395–419
(4) Gerbner, G. (1987). Science on television - How it affects public conceptions. Issues in Science and Technology, 3(3), 109-115.
ÀÌÈÄ ¸®µù¸®½ºÆ®´Â ÃßÈÄ °øÁö¿¹Á¤ |